QuestionMay 9, 2025

Let's assume a defendant knows right from wrong. Under which two circumstances would the law still excuse him under the irresistible impulse test? (Select 2 that apply) If the mental disease caused the defendant to so far lose the power to choose between right and wrong and to avoid doing the alleged act that the disease destroyed his free will. The defendant did not know that the act was wrong. If the mental disease was the sole cause of the act. The defendant did not kriow the nature and quality of the act.

Let's assume a defendant knows right from wrong. Under which two circumstances would the law still excuse him under the irresistible impulse test? (Select 2 that apply) If the mental disease caused the defendant to so far lose the power to choose between right and wrong and to avoid doing the alleged act that the disease destroyed his free will. The defendant did not know that the act was wrong. If the mental disease was the sole cause of the act. The defendant did not kriow the nature and quality of the act.
Let's assume a defendant knows right from wrong. Under which two circumstances would the law still excuse him under the irresistible impulse test? (Select 2 that apply)
If the mental disease caused the defendant to so far lose the power to choose between right and wrong and to avoid doing the alleged act that the disease destroyed
his free will.
The defendant did not know that the act was wrong.
If the mental disease was the sole cause of the act.
The defendant did not kriow the nature and quality of the act.

Solution
4.6(220 votes)

Answer

1. If the mental disease caused the defendant to so far lose the power to choose between right and wrong and to avoid doing the alleged act that the disease destroyed his free will. 2. The defendant did not know the nature and quality of the act. Explanation The irresistible impulse test allows for a defense if the defendant's mental disease significantly impairs their ability to control their actions, even if they understand right from wrong. The correct circumstances are when the disease destroys free will and when the defendant does not know the nature of the act.

Explanation

The irresistible impulse test allows for a defense if the defendant's mental disease significantly impairs their ability to control their actions, even if they understand right from wrong. The correct circumstances are when the disease destroys free will and when the defendant does not know the nature of the act.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions