QuestionMay 21, 2025

3. In Texas v.Johnson, the Supreme Court held that burning the American flag is A. an act of sedition that is protected by the Constitution. B. an act of dissent by conduct that is not protected by the Constitution. C. a form of symbolic speech that is not protected by the Constitution. D. a form of expression that is protected by the Constitution.

3. In Texas v.Johnson, the Supreme Court held that burning the American flag is A. an act of sedition that is protected by the Constitution. B. an act of dissent by conduct that is not protected by the Constitution. C. a form of symbolic speech that is not protected by the Constitution. D. a form of expression that is protected by the Constitution.
3. In Texas v.Johnson, the Supreme Court held that burning the American flag is
A. an act of sedition that is protected by the Constitution.
B. an act of dissent by conduct that is not protected by the Constitution.
C. a form of symbolic speech that is not protected by the Constitution.
D. a form of expression that is protected by the Constitution.

Solution
4.6(191 votes)

Answer

D. a form of expression that is protected by the Constitution. Explanation In Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court ruled that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. The decision emphasized that expression, even if controversial or offensive, cannot be prohibited simply because it may provoke public outrage.

Explanation

In Texas v. Johnson, the Supreme Court ruled that flag burning is a form of symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment. The decision emphasized that expression, even if controversial or offensive, cannot be prohibited simply because it may provoke public outrage.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions