QuestionJuly 14, 2025

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy whose adherents refuse to go beyond the clear words of the Constitution in interpreting the document's meaning; whereas, judicial activism is a judicial philosophy that encourages going beyond the plain meaning of the words and encourages considering the societal implications of a court's decision. True False

Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy whose adherents refuse to go beyond the clear words of the Constitution in interpreting the document's meaning; whereas, judicial activism is a judicial philosophy that encourages going beyond the plain meaning of the words and encourages considering the societal implications of a court's decision. True False
Judicial restraint is a judicial philosophy whose adherents refuse to go beyond the clear words of
the Constitution in interpreting the document's meaning; whereas, judicial activism is a judicial
philosophy that encourages going beyond the plain meaning of the words and encourages
considering the societal implications of a court's decision.
True
False

Solution
4.4(251 votes)

Answer

True Explanation The statement accurately describes the concepts of judicial restraint and judicial activism. Judicial restraint focuses on a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while judicial activism allows for broader interpretations that consider societal impacts.

Explanation

The statement accurately describes the concepts of judicial restraint and judicial activism. Judicial restraint focuses on a strict interpretation of the Constitution, while judicial activism allows for broader interpretations that consider societal impacts.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions