QuestionDecember 13, 2025

Which of the following is a general principle that Huemer offers in response to the "Harm to Users Argument"? The state should never interfere with people exercising their own free will. It is unjust for the state to punish people without having a good reason for doing so. The state should prohibit activities that are harmful to people. Both (a) and (b) All of the above

Which of the following is a general principle that Huemer offers in response to the "Harm to Users Argument"? The state should never interfere with people exercising their own free will. It is unjust for the state to punish people without having a good reason for doing so. The state should prohibit activities that are harmful to people. Both (a) and (b) All of the above
Which of the following is a general principle that Huemer offers in
response to the "Harm to Users Argument"?
The state should never interfere with people exercising their own
free will.
It is unjust for the state to punish people without having a good
reason for doing so.
The state should prohibit activities that are harmful to people.
Both (a) and (b)
All of the above

Solution
4.0(232 votes)

Answer

**Both (a) and (b)** Explanation Michael Huemer argues against drug prohibition through the *Harm to Users Argument*, emphasizing individual autonomy and justice. He maintains that the state should not interfere with personal choices and that punishing individuals requires a strong moral justification.

Explanation

Michael Huemer argues against drug prohibition through the *Harm to Users Argument*, emphasizing individual autonomy and justice. He maintains that the state should not interfere with personal choices and that punishing individuals requires a strong moral justification.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions