QuestionJune 9, 2025

Explain whether the following argument is deductive or inductive. The Flanagans are having their fourth child. All of their children are mathematically gifted, so the youngest child is bound to be mathematically gifted as well. Choose the correct answer below. A. The argument is deductive because the premise is general and the conclusion is specifiC. B. The argument is inductive because the premise is specific and the conclusion is general. C. The argument is inductive because the premise is general and the conclusion is specifiC. D. The argument is deductive because the premise is specific and the conclusion is general.

Explain whether the following argument is deductive or inductive. The Flanagans are having their fourth child. All of their children are mathematically gifted, so the youngest child is bound to be mathematically gifted as well. Choose the correct answer below. A. The argument is deductive because the premise is general and the conclusion is specifiC. B. The argument is inductive because the premise is specific and the conclusion is general. C. The argument is inductive because the premise is general and the conclusion is specifiC. D. The argument is deductive because the premise is specific and the conclusion is general.
Explain whether the following argument is deductive or inductive.
The Flanagans are having their fourth child. All of their children are mathematically gifted, so the youngest child is
bound to be mathematically gifted as well.
Choose the correct answer below.
A. The argument is deductive because the premise is general and the conclusion is specifiC.
B. The argument is inductive because the premise is specific and the conclusion is general.
C. The argument is inductive because the premise is general and the conclusion is specifiC.
D. The argument is deductive because the premise is specific and the conclusion is general.

Solution
4.4(274 votes)

Answer

C. The argument is inductive because the premise is general and the conclusion is specific. Explanation The argument uses a specific case (the Flanagans' children) to predict the outcome of another specific case (the youngest child being mathematically gifted). This indicates an inductive reasoning process, as it draws a conclusion based on observed patterns rather than guaranteed certainty.

Explanation

The argument uses a specific case (the Flanagans' children) to predict the outcome of another specific case (the youngest child being mathematically gifted). This indicates an inductive reasoning process, as it draws a conclusion based on observed patterns rather than guaranteed certainty.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions