QuestionMay 27, 2025

The hypothesis would not have been supported by the data if traits independently assorted in approximately a 9:3:3:1 ratio. the traits for white fur and red eyes were always inherited together. all the F1-offspring had the same phenotype.

The hypothesis would not have been supported by the data if traits independently assorted in approximately a 9:3:3:1 ratio. the traits for white fur and red eyes were always inherited together. all the F1-offspring had the same phenotype.
The hypothesis would not have been supported
by the data if
traits independently assorted in
approximately a 9:3:3:1 ratio.
the traits for white fur and red eyes were
always inherited together.
all the F1-offspring had the same phenotype.

Solution
4.0(251 votes)

Answer

The hypothesis would not have been supported by the data if the traits for white fur and red eyes were always inherited together. Explanation 1. Analyze the 9:3:3:1 Ratio The 9:3:3:1 ratio indicates independent assortment of two traits. If this ratio is observed, it supports the hypothesis of independent assortment. 2. Consider Linked Traits If traits for white fur and red eyes are always inherited together, they are linked, not independently assorted. This would not support the hypothesis of independent assortment. 3. Evaluate Uniform F1 Phenotype If all F1-offspring have the same phenotype, it suggests complete dominance or linkage, not independent assortment.

Explanation

1. Analyze the 9:3:3:1 Ratio<br /> The 9:3:3:1 ratio indicates independent assortment of two traits. If this ratio is observed, it supports the hypothesis of independent assortment.<br /><br />2. Consider Linked Traits<br /> If traits for white fur and red eyes are always inherited together, they are linked, not independently assorted. This would not support the hypothesis of independent assortment.<br /><br />3. Evaluate Uniform F1 Phenotype<br /> If all F1-offspring have the same phenotype, it suggests complete dominance or linkage, not independent assortment.
Click to rate: