QuestionJune 5, 2025

Which of these is an objection that has been raised in regard to the use of zoning and urban growth boundaries? They are a violation of private property rights under the Takings Clause. They will scare businesses away from cities, and jobs will vanish. They cause property values in cities to drop. They will increase infrastructure costs to taxpayers.

Which of these is an objection that has been raised in regard to the use of zoning and urban growth boundaries? They are a violation of private property rights under the Takings Clause. They will scare businesses away from cities, and jobs will vanish. They cause property values in cities to drop. They will increase infrastructure costs to taxpayers.
Which of these is an objection that has been raised in regard to the use of zoning and urban growth boundaries?
They are a violation of private property rights under the Takings Clause.
They will scare businesses away from cities, and jobs will vanish.
They cause property values in cities to drop.
They will increase infrastructure costs to taxpayers.

Solution
4.4(204 votes)

Answer

They are a violation of private property rights under the Takings Clause. Explanation Zoning and urban growth boundaries can be seen as a violation of private property rights under the Takings Clause, which protects against government seizure of property without just compensation. This objection is often raised in discussions about land use regulations.

Explanation

Zoning and urban growth boundaries can be seen as a violation of private property rights under the Takings Clause, which protects against government seizure of property without just compensation. This objection is often raised in discussions about land use regulations.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions