QuestionJuly 9, 2025

Batman will defeat the Joker or he did not see the Bat signal. Batman defeated the Joker. Therefore, Batman did see the Bat signal. Identify the common form of the argument or fallacy. Direct Argument Fallacy of the Converse Contrapositive Reasoning Fallacy of the Inverse Transitive Reasoning Misuse of Transitive Reasoning Disjunctive Reasoning Misuse of Disjunctive Reasoning Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. Valid Invalid

Batman will defeat the Joker or he did not see the Bat signal. Batman defeated the Joker. Therefore, Batman did see the Bat signal. Identify the common form of the argument or fallacy. Direct Argument Fallacy of the Converse Contrapositive Reasoning Fallacy of the Inverse Transitive Reasoning Misuse of Transitive Reasoning Disjunctive Reasoning Misuse of Disjunctive Reasoning Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid. Valid Invalid
Batman will defeat the Joker or he did not see the Bat signal.
Batman defeated the Joker.
Therefore, Batman did see the Bat signal.
Identify the common form of the argument or fallacy.
Direct Argument
Fallacy of the Converse
Contrapositive Reasoning
Fallacy of the Inverse
Transitive Reasoning
Misuse of Transitive Reasoning
Disjunctive Reasoning
Misuse of Disjunctive Reasoning
Determine whether the argument is valid or invalid.
Valid
Invalid

Solution
4.5(202 votes)

Answer

Common form: Fallacy of the Inverse Validity: Invalid Explanation The argument follows the structure of disjunctive reasoning, where one option must be true if the other is false. However, it incorrectly assumes that seeing the Bat signal is necessary for Batman to defeat the Joker. This leads to a fallacy known as the Fallacy of the Inverse. The argument is invalid because it does not logically follow from its premises.

Explanation

The argument follows the structure of disjunctive reasoning, where one option must be true if the other is false. However, it incorrectly assumes that seeing the Bat signal is necessary for Batman to defeat the Joker. This leads to a fallacy known as the Fallacy of the Inverse. The argument is invalid because it does not logically follow from its premises.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions