QuestionMay 30, 2025

In Butler v. the United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the special tax under the Agricultural Adjustment Act was illegal. the government was obligated to help farmers affected by the Dust Bowl. farmers were obliged to curtail production without government compensation. government could not subsidize business in any manner.

In Butler v. the United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the special tax under the Agricultural Adjustment Act was illegal. the government was obligated to help farmers affected by the Dust Bowl. farmers were obliged to curtail production without government compensation. government could not subsidize business in any manner.
In Butler v. the United States, the Supreme Court ruled
that
the special tax under the Agricultural Adjustment Act was
illegal.
the government was obligated to help farmers affected by
the Dust Bowl.
farmers were obliged to curtail production without
government compensation.
government could not subsidize business in any manner.

Solution
4.3(306 votes)

Answer

the special tax under the Agricultural Adjustment Act was illegal. Explanation In Butler v. the United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Agricultural Adjustment Act's special tax was unconstitutional because it imposed a penalty on farmers for not complying with production limits, thus infringing upon their rights without just compensation.

Explanation

In Butler v. the United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Agricultural Adjustment Act's special tax was unconstitutional because it imposed a penalty on farmers for not complying with production limits, thus infringing upon their rights without just compensation.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions