QuestionJuly 19, 2025

In Gregg V. Georgia what was not a part of the argument to guide the court's future death penalty decisions? An arbitrary death penalty is constitutional An arbitrary death penalty is unconstitutional A discriminatory death penalty is unconstitutional A death penalty that flouts the dignity of man is unconstitutional

In Gregg V. Georgia what was not a part of the argument to guide the court's future death penalty decisions? An arbitrary death penalty is constitutional An arbitrary death penalty is unconstitutional A discriminatory death penalty is unconstitutional A death penalty that flouts the dignity of man is unconstitutional
In Gregg V. Georgia what was not a part of the argument to guide the court's future death penalty decisions? An arbitrary death penalty is constitutional An arbitrary death penalty is unconstitutional A discriminatory death penalty is unconstitutional A death penalty that flouts the dignity of man is unconstitutional

Solution
4.1(166 votes)

Answer

An arbitrary death penalty is constitutional Explanation In Gregg v. Georgia, the court addressed the constitutionality of the death penalty and emphasized that it must be applied fairly and without discrimination. The argument stating "An arbitrary death penalty is constitutional" contradicts the principles established in this case.

Explanation

In Gregg v. Georgia, the court addressed the constitutionality of the death penalty and emphasized that it must be applied fairly and without discrimination. The argument stating "An arbitrary death penalty is constitutional" contradicts the principles established in this case.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions