QuestionJune 15, 2025

What was the Federalists' argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution? It might be used later to limit rights that weren't originally listed. It was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms It was unnecessary because the new government had limited power

What was the Federalists' argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution? It might be used later to limit rights that weren't originally listed. It was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms It was unnecessary because the new government had limited power
What was the Federalists' argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?
It might be used later to limit rights that weren't originally listed.
It was unnecessary because everyone had been granted basic freedoms
It was unnecessary because the new government had limited power

Solution
4.6(219 votes)

Answer

It might be used later to limit rights that weren't originally listed. Explanation The Federalists argued that a bill of rights was unnecessary because the Constitution itself limited government powers, and any rights not listed could be interpreted as being protected. They feared that enumerating specific rights might imply that unlisted rights were not protected.

Explanation

The Federalists argued that a bill of rights was unnecessary because the Constitution itself limited government powers, and any rights not listed could be interpreted as being protected. They feared that enumerating specific rights might imply that unlisted rights were not protected.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions