QuestionJuly 4, 2025

Questions for Analysis 1. Identify a specific similarity between Las Casas's and Sepúlveda's descriptions of the native people in the Western Hemisphere. 2. Identify a specific difference between Las Casas's and Sepúlveda's descriptions of the native people in the Western Hemisphere. 3. Describe a specific historical difference in the way Las Casas and Sepúlveda believed native people should be treated by the Spanish.

Questions for Analysis 1. Identify a specific similarity between Las Casas's and Sepúlveda's descriptions of the native people in the Western Hemisphere. 2. Identify a specific difference between Las Casas's and Sepúlveda's descriptions of the native people in the Western Hemisphere. 3. Describe a specific historical difference in the way Las Casas and Sepúlveda believed native people should be treated by the Spanish.
Questions for Analysis
1. Identify a specific similarity between Las Casas's and Sepúlveda's descriptions of the native
people in the Western Hemisphere.
2. Identify a specific difference between Las Casas's and Sepúlveda's descriptions of the native
people in the Western Hemisphere.
3. Describe a specific historical difference in the way Las Casas and Sepúlveda believed native
people should be treated by the Spanish.

Solution
4.1(227 votes)

Answer

1. They both recognized the existence of native peoples as distinct cultural groups. 2. Las Casas saw natives as equals deserving respect; Sepúlveda deemed them inferior and justifiable for exploitation. 3. Las Casas believed in peaceful conversion and protection, while Sepúlveda endorsed violent conquest and domination. Explanation 1. Both Las Casas and Sepúlveda acknowledged the existence of native peoples in the Western Hemisphere, recognizing them as distinct groups with their own cultures. 2. Las Casas viewed natives as rational beings deserving of respect and protection, while Sepúlveda considered them inferior and justified their subjugation. 3. Las Casas advocated for humane treatment and conversion through peaceful means, whereas Sepúlveda supported violent conquest and domination.

Explanation

1. Both Las Casas and Sepúlveda acknowledged the existence of native peoples in the Western Hemisphere, recognizing them as distinct groups with their own cultures.<br />2. Las Casas viewed natives as rational beings deserving of respect and protection, while Sepúlveda considered them inferior and justified their subjugation.<br />3. Las Casas advocated for humane treatment and conversion through peaceful means, whereas Sepúlveda supported violent conquest and domination.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions