QuestionJuly 2, 2025

How do judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion? A. In the dissent the majority opinion itself is used as evidence. B. The arguments of the dissent are reviewed and summarized. C. The dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support. D. Notes taken by the attorneys are used to support the dissent's argument.

How do judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority opinion? A. In the dissent the majority opinion itself is used as evidence. B. The arguments of the dissent are reviewed and summarized. C. The dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support. D. Notes taken by the attorneys are used to support the dissent's argument.
How do judicial reviews in the dissent differ from those in the majority
opinion?
A. In the dissent the majority opinion itself is used as evidence.
B. The arguments of the dissent are reviewed and summarized.
C. The dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support.
D. Notes taken by the attorneys are used to support the dissent's
argument.

Solution
4.2(144 votes)

Answer

C. The dissent depends on previous, similar cases for support. Explanation Judicial reviews in dissent typically focus on critiquing the majority opinion rather than summarizing it. Dissenting opinions often rely on previous cases to support their arguments, making option C the most accurate representation of how dissents differ from majority opinions.

Explanation

Judicial reviews in dissent typically focus on critiquing the majority opinion rather than summarizing it. Dissenting opinions often rely on previous cases to support their arguments, making option C the most accurate representation of how dissents differ from majority opinions.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions