QuestionAugust 18, 2025

In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the defendant's: A. freedom of assembly. B. protection against unreasonable search and seizure. C. protection against double jeopardy. D. right to avoid self-incrimination.

In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that tapping a public phone without a warrant violated the defendant's: A. freedom of assembly. B. protection against unreasonable search and seizure. C. protection against double jeopardy. D. right to avoid self-incrimination.
In Katz v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that tapping a public phone
without a warrant violated the defendant's:
A. freedom of assembly.
B. protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
C. protection against double jeopardy.
D. right to avoid self-incrimination.

Solution
3.2(137 votes)

Answer

B. protection against unreasonable search and seizure. Explanation The Supreme Court's ruling in Katz v. United States established that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their conversations, even in public spaces. This decision reinforced the protection against unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment.

Explanation

The Supreme Court's ruling in Katz v. United States established that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their conversations, even in public spaces. This decision reinforced the protection against unreasonable search and seizure under the Fourth Amendment.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions