QuestionJuly 7, 2025

Andrew weighs less than Carl and Carl is heavier than Marty. Therefore, it follows that Andrew weighs less than Marty. Given only this argument, and no additiona information, which of the following best characterizes the argument: Sound Unsound Cogent Uncogent None of the others We need to know the actual weights of Andrew. Carl, and Marty.

Andrew weighs less than Carl and Carl is heavier than Marty. Therefore, it follows that Andrew weighs less than Marty. Given only this argument, and no additiona information, which of the following best characterizes the argument: Sound Unsound Cogent Uncogent None of the others We need to know the actual weights of Andrew. Carl, and Marty.
Andrew weighs less than Carl and Carl is heavier than Marty.
Therefore, it follows that Andrew weighs less than Marty.
Given only this argument, and no additiona information,
which of the following best characterizes the argument:
Sound
Unsound
Cogent
Uncogent
None of the others We need to know the actual weights of
Andrew. Carl, and Marty.

Solution
4.2(277 votes)

Answer

Uncogent Explanation The argument is based on relative weight comparisons but does not provide sufficient information to definitively conclude that Andrew weighs less than Marty. Therefore, it lacks the necessary support for its conclusion and is considered uncogent.

Explanation

The argument is based on relative weight comparisons but does not provide sufficient information to definitively conclude that Andrew weighs less than Marty. Therefore, it lacks the necessary support for its conclusion and is considered uncogent.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions