In Flagiello v. Pennsylvania Hospital, the court had to balance the hospital's negligence against the charitable immunity doctrine to determine whether Flagiello could recover for injuries sustained on the hospital's property. In its holding.the court determined that the charitable immunity doctrine had been litigated in the past and stare decisis required that the court adhere to established case precedent and find for the hospital. the charitable immunity doctrine can be repealed or overturned only by the state's legislature, and stare decisis required that case precedent be followed; however, due to the severity of Flagiello's injuries, the charitable immunity doctrine allowed for certain exceptions, permitting Flagiello to recover in this case. the charitable immunity doctrine was specifically and clearly written; therefore, the court was bound to follow the clear intent of the statutory scheme and find for the hospital. current societal norms rendered the charitable immunity doctrine inapplicable to this case and fundamental fairness allowed the court to deviate from established case precedent and find for Flagiello.

Solution4.7(260 votes)
Answer
Explanation
Similar Questions
The __ law of California state forbids private schools from violating students' Firs Amendment rights. Collins Miller Holmes Leonard
One of the constant themes in corrections is that money, or a lack thereof, is a factor in virtually all correctional policy decisions. True False
Judicial review allows the courts to a. check if Congress has exceeded its constitutional authority. b. check if the president has exceeded his constitutional authority. c. check if the states have exceeded their constitutional authority. D d. All of the above
The process of documenting incidents is known as __ typeyouranswer disappointed
Which of the following is an approach that combines institutional and community corrections? A Strict confinement only B Community isolation programs C Restorative justice only D Hybrid models
The __ declares that the national government's authority prevails over any conflicting state or local government's claim. Commerce Clause Necessary and Proper Clause Supremacy Clause Second Amendment
Each of the following are examples of how researchers may expose themselves to criminal liability EXCEPT? Engaging in participant observation studies where crimes are committed Engaging in criminal activity Failing to report observed criminal activity to the police Knowing about illegal activities participants are engaging in
The outcome of Schenck v. United States was a. the bad tendency rule. b. the clear and present danger test. c. the imminent lawless action text. d. the grave and probable danger test.
Who initially determines the time of death at a crime scene? police officer coroner's assistant detective paramedic
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 expanded and encouraged voting and has been renewed and amended by Congress four times. Together with federal court rulings, what does the law now do? Require states to use literacy tests in voter registrations Require states to provide absentee or early voting Require residency requirements of more than 30 days for voting in presidential elections Require states to eliminate segregation