QuestionJune 17, 2025

What is a key distinction in Kantian ethics between acting for the sake of duty and acting in accordance with duty? Acting for the sake of duty is morally praiseworthy, while acting in accordance with duty is morally required. Acting for the sake of duty is morally praiseworthy, while acting in accordance with duty is not. Acting for the sake of duty is morally neutral, while acting in accordance with duty is praiseworthy. Acting for the sake of duty is morally required, while acting in accordance with duty is supererogatory.

What is a key distinction in Kantian ethics between acting for the sake of duty and acting in accordance with duty? Acting for the sake of duty is morally praiseworthy, while acting in accordance with duty is morally required. Acting for the sake of duty is morally praiseworthy, while acting in accordance with duty is not. Acting for the sake of duty is morally neutral, while acting in accordance with duty is praiseworthy. Acting for the sake of duty is morally required, while acting in accordance with duty is supererogatory.
What is a key distinction in Kantian ethics between acting for the sake of duty and acting in
accordance with duty?
Acting for the sake of duty is morally praiseworthy, while acting in accordance with duty is morally required.
Acting for the sake of duty is morally praiseworthy, while acting in accordance with duty is not.
Acting for the sake of duty is morally neutral, while acting in accordance with duty is praiseworthy.
Acting for the sake of duty is morally required, while acting in accordance with duty is supererogatory.

Solution
4.1(268 votes)

Answer

Acting for the sake of duty is morally praiseworthy, while acting in accordance with duty is morally required. Explanation In Kantian ethics, acting for the sake of duty means performing an action because it is one's moral obligation, which is morally praiseworthy. In contrast, acting in accordance with duty may involve doing the right thing for other reasons, which does not carry the same moral weight.

Explanation

In Kantian ethics, acting for the sake of duty means performing an action because it is one's moral obligation, which is morally praiseworthy. In contrast, acting in accordance with duty may involve doing the right thing for other reasons, which does not carry the same moral weight.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions