QuestionJune 4, 2025

A simple Kimwipe taped to the bottom of a hood sash so that it can blow in the wind (Source: ACS) cannot be relied upon as an indicator of airflow though inexpensive, is a much more sensive measure of airflow than most electronic airflow indicators is a reasonably good way to tell if the hood is working properly

A simple Kimwipe taped to the bottom of a hood sash so that it can blow in the wind (Source: ACS) cannot be relied upon as an indicator of airflow though inexpensive, is a much more sensive measure of airflow than most electronic airflow indicators is a reasonably good way to tell if the hood is working properly
A simple Kimwipe taped to the bottom of a hood sash so that it can blow in the
wind (Source: ACS)
cannot be relied upon as an indicator of airflow
though inexpensive, is a much more sensive measure of airflow than most electronic
airflow indicators
is a reasonably good way to tell if the hood is working properly

Solution
4.7(280 votes)

Answer

A simple Kimwipe taped to the bottom of a hood sash is a reasonably good way to tell if the hood is working properly. Explanation 1. Evaluate the statement The statement suggests that a Kimwipe taped to the bottom of a hood sash is used as an indicator of airflow. 2. Analyze reliability It mentions that it cannot be relied upon as an indicator of airflow, implying it is not a dependable method. 3. Compare sensitivity It states that despite being inexpensive, it is more sensitive than most electronic airflow indicators, suggesting it can detect subtle changes in airflow. 4. Assess effectiveness It concludes by saying it is a reasonably good way to tell if the hood is working properly, indicating it has some practical utility.

Explanation

1. Evaluate the statement<br /> The statement suggests that a Kimwipe taped to the bottom of a hood sash is used as an indicator of airflow.<br /><br />2. Analyze reliability<br /> It mentions that it cannot be relied upon as an indicator of airflow, implying it is not a dependable method.<br /><br />3. Compare sensitivity<br /> It states that despite being inexpensive, it is more sensitive than most electronic airflow indicators, suggesting it can detect subtle changes in airflow.<br /><br />4. Assess effectiveness<br /> It concludes by saying it is a reasonably good way to tell if the hood is working properly, indicating it has some practical utility.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions