QuestionAugust 2, 2025

Which of the following is an advantage of PAC? The cost of PAC equipment can be higher than for other cutting processes. A source of electricity is needed. The metal fumes created can be a health hazard. No hazardous or explosive gases are used.

Which of the following is an advantage of PAC? The cost of PAC equipment can be higher than for other cutting processes. A source of electricity is needed. The metal fumes created can be a health hazard. No hazardous or explosive gases are used.
Which of the following is an advantage of PAC?
The cost of PAC equipment can be higher than for other cutting processes.
A source of electricity is needed.
The metal fumes created can be a health hazard.
No hazardous or explosive gases are used.

Solution
4.1(219 votes)

Answer

No hazardous or explosive gases are used. Explanation 1. Identify the Advantage Analyze each option to determine which one is a positive aspect of Plasma Arc Cutting (PAC). - **Option 1**: Higher cost is a disadvantage. - **Option 2**: Needing electricity is a requirement, not an advantage. - **Option 3**: Metal fumes being hazardous is a disadvantage. - **Option 4**: Not using hazardous or explosive gases is a safety advantage.

Explanation

1. Identify the Advantage<br /> Analyze each option to determine which one is a positive aspect of Plasma Arc Cutting (PAC).<br /><br />- **Option 1**: Higher cost is a disadvantage.<br />- **Option 2**: Needing electricity is a requirement, not an advantage.<br />- **Option 3**: Metal fumes being hazardous is a disadvantage.<br />- **Option 4**: Not using hazardous or explosive gases is a safety advantage.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions