QuestionJune 29, 2025

One response to the no-branching constraint argues that numerical identity is actually much less practically important than we think. as a concept, can be broadened to block any counterintuitive consequences. as a concept related to personal identity, begs the questions. as a concept, is itself incoherent.

One response to the no-branching constraint argues that numerical identity is actually much less practically important than we think. as a concept, can be broadened to block any counterintuitive consequences. as a concept related to personal identity, begs the questions. as a concept, is itself incoherent.
One response to the no-branching constraint argues that numerical identity
is actually much less practically important than we think.
as a concept, can be broadened to block any counterintuitive consequences.
as a concept related to personal identity, begs the questions.
as a concept, is itself incoherent.

Solution
4.1(238 votes)

Answer

as a concept, is itself incoherent. Explanation The no-branching constraint in discussions of personal identity suggests that an individual cannot split into two distinct identities. The argument presented here critiques the importance and coherence of numerical identity, suggesting it may not be as significant or clear-cut as traditionally thought.

Explanation

The no-branching constraint in discussions of personal identity suggests that an individual cannot split into two distinct identities. The argument presented here critiques the importance and coherence of numerical identity, suggesting it may not be as significant or clear-cut as traditionally thought.
Click to rate:

Similar Questions